We all no coticules are renowed for nice smooth yet mellow edges?
Certain coticules are well known for leaving a very mellow edge as apose to engaging etc..
What i'd like to no , is knowing how a certain layer of coticule, for example L a noveille vain or La grosse blanch layer , can leave such mellow edges? so any one no why and how this is? has it got somthing to do with the amount or size of the garnets? i realy don't have a clue.
gary
Certain coticules are well known for leaving a very mellow edge as apose to engaging etc..
What i'd like to no , is knowing how a certain layer of coticule, for example L a noveille vain or La grosse blanch layer , can leave such mellow edges? so any one no why and how this is? has it got somthing to do with the amount or size of the garnets? i realy don't have a clue.
gary
gary haywood
2011-11-14 23:02
Me neither mate
I believe, but may be wrong, that Garnets are relatively uniform in size?
Maybe it has more to do with how easily they release them?
Then you have all that "fast stones must give crisp edges" nonsense, take LV's for example, they cut quick on slurry and as you know the edges can be like butter
Beats me Gary, it could even be down to what makes up the rest of the stone, and not the Garnets?
Hopefully someone who knows better will chip in
Regards
Ralfson (Dr)
I believe, but may be wrong, that Garnets are relatively uniform in size?
Maybe it has more to do with how easily they release them?
Then you have all that "fast stones must give crisp edges" nonsense, take LV's for example, they cut quick on slurry and as you know the edges can be like butter
Beats me Gary, it could even be down to what makes up the rest of the stone, and not the Garnets?
Hopefully someone who knows better will chip in
Regards
Ralfson (Dr)
We Are All Pioneers In Our Own Right.
The Infamous Coticule Crew
Pip Pip Old Bean
The Infamous Coticule Crew
Pip Pip Old Bean
2011-11-14 23:59
I never had a crisp edge of a Coticule, but then again, what's in the word "crisp"? We've had that discussion before.
I do use "brisk" for a refreshing, rejuvenating kind of shave. "Mellow" for the kind of shave that leaves the skin feeling the exactly the same as before the shave. And "engaging" for when I can't make up my mind about either of the above.
Anyway, I find the differences extremely small, to the extent that I have regretted more that I ever introduced those three terms in the Vault descriptions, than I have found them useful. With the kind of tricks that every seasoned razor honer should have up his sleeve, I believe any Coticule can be coaxed in doing what its master wants it to do. Lately the concept of surface refreshment before finishing has received good attention. You definitely can do that, but you definitely can also deliberately not do that, and finish on a more "worn" surface. Or you can do the "one rub"-trick, and finish on a hint of slurry. You can do that edge-leading, or spine leading. You can use oil. You can clog the surface with tea candle wax. All these different treatments do make a difference. And then there's the (by my experience highly underrated influence of different bevel angles). Some strategies will turn a "brisk" stone "mellow", and others will turn a "mellow" stone "brisk".
How comes? I don't think anyone knows. Likely garnet sizes differ, perhaps some layers tend to have more uniform garnets. And then there the influence of finely grained quartzite, that possibly has a bigger influence during the finishing stages on water, than we imagine. I think we can only ever reveal some of this, by doing extensive research with Scanning Electron Microscopy, of the kind John Verhoeven did in his knife sharpening experiments. Coticule.be owns a set of razors with detachable scales and the sample Coticules to put the edges on. But no access to a SEM.
But as said, in the end, all that matters is that the user knows how to use his Coticule to the best of his liking. I've had Coticules that I liked better than others, for reasons that I find impossible to put into words. Mostly based on how the stone behaves while honing, the song it sings, the hand it fits, etc. But never have I met a Coticule that I could give to another Coticule user, with the words "here, use this one, it will be betterthan the one you already have. If you ask me about my "best" Coticule, I honestly could not give any meaningful answer.
Kind regards,
Bart.
I do use "brisk" for a refreshing, rejuvenating kind of shave. "Mellow" for the kind of shave that leaves the skin feeling the exactly the same as before the shave. And "engaging" for when I can't make up my mind about either of the above.
Anyway, I find the differences extremely small, to the extent that I have regretted more that I ever introduced those three terms in the Vault descriptions, than I have found them useful. With the kind of tricks that every seasoned razor honer should have up his sleeve, I believe any Coticule can be coaxed in doing what its master wants it to do. Lately the concept of surface refreshment before finishing has received good attention. You definitely can do that, but you definitely can also deliberately not do that, and finish on a more "worn" surface. Or you can do the "one rub"-trick, and finish on a hint of slurry. You can do that edge-leading, or spine leading. You can use oil. You can clog the surface with tea candle wax. All these different treatments do make a difference. And then there's the (by my experience highly underrated influence of different bevel angles). Some strategies will turn a "brisk" stone "mellow", and others will turn a "mellow" stone "brisk".
How comes? I don't think anyone knows. Likely garnet sizes differ, perhaps some layers tend to have more uniform garnets. And then there the influence of finely grained quartzite, that possibly has a bigger influence during the finishing stages on water, than we imagine. I think we can only ever reveal some of this, by doing extensive research with Scanning Electron Microscopy, of the kind John Verhoeven did in his knife sharpening experiments. Coticule.be owns a set of razors with detachable scales and the sample Coticules to put the edges on. But no access to a SEM.
But as said, in the end, all that matters is that the user knows how to use his Coticule to the best of his liking. I've had Coticules that I liked better than others, for reasons that I find impossible to put into words. Mostly based on how the stone behaves while honing, the song it sings, the hand it fits, etc. But never have I met a Coticule that I could give to another Coticule user, with the words "here, use this one, it will be betterthan the one you already have. If you ask me about my "best" Coticule, I honestly could not give any meaningful answer.
Kind regards,
Bart.
Then the light shone, trumpets sounded and I got to the other side, where men shave with smiles on their faces, razors pop hairs, and a continuous choir singing «~~Keen and Smooth~~» is heard everywhere. (Matt)
http://www.artisanshaving.org
http://www.artisanshaving.org
2011-11-15 02:26
Aside from scientific explanations and proofs, is it safe to say that IT IS possible that certain layers are gentler than others on the skin? Take La Grise (the mellowest?), La Nouvelle Veine, and La Grosse Blanche for example. These layers are synonymous with "smooth," and "mellow." On the other hand, La Dressante and Les Latneuses (hybrid aside) are known for their brisk edges. La Veinettes are fast, keen, and smooth.
Shouldn't finishers generally be slow on water, as to provide consistent and smooth edges?
Shouldn't finishers generally be slow on water, as to provide consistent and smooth edges?
2011-11-15 04:11
I agree with Bart. I've never had a shave off a coticule that was too "crisp", and I refuse to let my head explode over the meaning of the words again
I've discovered, and learned to differentiate, the delightful edges classified as "crisp/brisk", "engaging", and "mellow", and they're all excellent in their own ways. I find myself debating with myself which I prefer over others, but I never fully conclude definitively which is better in my estimation.
At the end of the day, I think there's a tendancy by some to classify all the edges that are truly excellent as "mellow" where I may classify them crisp or engaging. And, anything that falls short of the keenness limit that we need to be "crisp" because it leaves the face feeling slightly burned rather than the rejuvenated excellence of a "crisp" or "brisk" edge...
Of course, that's purly conjecture.
I've discovered, and learned to differentiate, the delightful edges classified as "crisp/brisk", "engaging", and "mellow", and they're all excellent in their own ways. I find myself debating with myself which I prefer over others, but I never fully conclude definitively which is better in my estimation.
At the end of the day, I think there's a tendancy by some to classify all the edges that are truly excellent as "mellow" where I may classify them crisp or engaging. And, anything that falls short of the keenness limit that we need to be "crisp" because it leaves the face feeling slightly burned rather than the rejuvenated excellence of a "crisp" or "brisk" edge...
Of course, that's purly conjecture.
Paul
"Focus on the journey, not the destination. Joy is found not in finishing an activity but in doing it" - Greg Anderson
my blog- and it works again :p
"Focus on the journey, not the destination. Joy is found not in finishing an activity but in doing it" - Greg Anderson
my blog- and it works again :p
2011-11-15 04:48
I read these threads with great interest. I confess I can't tell the difference, but maybe I've not bracketed the full range of possibilities. I only have a Verte, Veinette and Dressante. I've gotten blades sharpened by generous other folks and I can't tell a difference with them either. I can only detect varying degrees of keeness, but all edges leave my skin feeling shaved and stinging a bit with alcohol based aftershaves. All seem brisk. Mellow sounds so appealing, but I wouldn't know it if it bit me on the ass, or would I?
All I know is that anything I do to modify a coticule edge definitely makes that edge harsher, with the possible exception of a Thuringian, which seems pretty smooth but a little less keen.
All I know is that anything I do to modify a coticule edge definitely makes that edge harsher, with the possible exception of a Thuringian, which seems pretty smooth but a little less keen.
Rick Edwards
2011-11-15 07:08
great answers. I have had many differant coticules. I think as some of you say, its down to the way the razor turns out. mellow to me is where the edge feels so so dull as i'm shaving. After shave you would not think a razor has been across your face. This is a common typical coticule edge, to me.
If you reach full keeness chances are your edge will fel like this , so it most likely is down to the honing . either way these are my favourite edges , and the reason i like the coticule edge, as i found no other hone as ever deliverd that kind of feel during the shave . I have noticed slight differances , and i would say thats due to the razor not being quite where i want it, i have not ised some edges to be slightly harsher during the shave , these have been razor s with amazing HHT, when i say harsh i mean just not as buttery, not harsh in a over done edge or over pasted. Just not as buttery.
i was thinking its more likely down to the result of honing?
thanxs gary
If you reach full keeness chances are your edge will fel like this , so it most likely is down to the honing . either way these are my favourite edges , and the reason i like the coticule edge, as i found no other hone as ever deliverd that kind of feel during the shave . I have noticed slight differances , and i would say thats due to the razor not being quite where i want it, i have not ised some edges to be slightly harsher during the shave , these have been razor s with amazing HHT, when i say harsh i mean just not as buttery, not harsh in a over done edge or over pasted. Just not as buttery.
i was thinking its more likely down to the result of honing?
thanxs gary
gary haywood
2011-11-15 07:56
Mates and you Gary ,i am feeling really unable to give all of that i have i my mind in english ,as is not my native language . But i ll try to find some words to do it believing that this issue is difficult even for the maternally english-speaking mates.
As you know my whole experience concerns only coticules but more than twenty years i used just my heritage coticules working exclusively on these.
Later i bought more from Ardennes due to my Patricia nationality and due to coticule.be.
So I'm in the final conclusion that the cotcule garnets are relatively uniform in size as said.
What is dramatically different is the binder and the consistency. Is like on a combo natural coticule no doubt the coticule side or blue side have uniform garnets but the edge result is completely different and according my opinion what is different is the consistency.
Some coticules give the impression that are webbed ,for me this kind gives mellow edges and less faster than others releasing with some difficulty slurry.
Other coticules give the impression that the garnets excess more of the surface releasing more slurry and are faster even on clear water.This kind give according Bart nomenclature engaging edges.
I never took a crispy edge from a coticule .
Finally i am sure for one thing , i am able to get a very smooth shave from all coticules i tried so far honed either by elliptical motions or half strokes .
Best regards
Emmanuel
As you know my whole experience concerns only coticules but more than twenty years i used just my heritage coticules working exclusively on these.
Later i bought more from Ardennes due to my Patricia nationality and due to coticule.be.
So I'm in the final conclusion that the cotcule garnets are relatively uniform in size as said.
What is dramatically different is the binder and the consistency. Is like on a combo natural coticule no doubt the coticule side or blue side have uniform garnets but the edge result is completely different and according my opinion what is different is the consistency.
Some coticules give the impression that are webbed ,for me this kind gives mellow edges and less faster than others releasing with some difficulty slurry.
Other coticules give the impression that the garnets excess more of the surface releasing more slurry and are faster even on clear water.This kind give according Bart nomenclature engaging edges.
I never took a crispy edge from a coticule .
Finally i am sure for one thing , i am able to get a very smooth shave from all coticules i tried so far honed either by elliptical motions or half strokes .
Best regards
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Giannoulakis
from Athens Greece
from Athens Greece
2011-11-15 14:13
Thanks for these insights, all.
Emmanuel, ο φίλος μου, would you permit me a friendly request on behalf of all the forum, if I may, for your honing video? It will be a great addition to other great videos here.
With your great aviation engineering, architectural, civil engineering, farming, sharpening, vintage-music-instrument restoring talents
, we cannot believe you cannot get a little video camera to look over your coticule.
If you like, I can volunteer to sub-title it. What do you say?
George
(Half in joke, please don't take it too seriously if your house construction is keeping you too busy.
)
(Translation by Google -
sorry if not precise.)
Emmanuel, ο φίλος μου, would you permit me a friendly request on behalf of all the forum, if I may, for your honing video? It will be a great addition to other great videos here.
With your great aviation engineering, architectural, civil engineering, farming, sharpening, vintage-music-instrument restoring talents
If you like, I can volunteer to sub-title it. What do you say?
George
(Half in joke, please don't take it too seriously if your house construction is keeping you too busy.
(Translation by Google -
George
------
Proud owner of Franz Kline Coticule from Ardennes via Bart
Hoping for Edge, Working on Bevel. © 2010
------
Proud owner of Franz Kline Coticule from Ardennes via Bart
Hoping for Edge, Working on Bevel. © 2010
2011-11-15 14:43
Of coarse George φίλε μου. I will do it. Is truth that i haven't a video camera. I have an expensive picture camera but is not suitable for this job .
But we have two solutions. Or ill find some body to film me during honing or Bart will tape me in Belgium the next visit there.
Tanks for your king words.
Best regards
Emmanuel
But we have two solutions. Or ill find some body to film me during honing or Bart will tape me in Belgium the next visit there.
Tanks for your king words.
Best regards
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Giannoulakis
from Athens Greece
from Athens Greece
2011-11-15 16:08
I'm getting those slightly harsh edges just now that your talking about Gary. I've found once I'm definitely into the final finishing stages, I go into x strokes and hone until the blade becomes magnetic and also bites into the hone as well. The ones that had too much of a 'bite' gave a slightly harsher shave, If I stop as soon as I get a nice magnetic feeling plus a little bite, its a better balance.
refreshing the surface I think works because any swarf on the surface covers garnets that were just sticking out and so will not refine the edge as much as opposed to a fully open table of slightly protruding garnets. Thats my thinking anyways. I thought at the start my coti was super slow on water, now its alot faster, sometimes 50 laps after slurry after refreshing it, I recently got a la verte mini coti and it has less tendancy to swarf up on the surface. its a bit easier to get a HHT.
I'm just a coti newbie, but is it the case that the only difference between coticules is how you get to a good HHT, some being easier than others to get an edge?
regards Alex
refreshing the surface I think works because any swarf on the surface covers garnets that were just sticking out and so will not refine the edge as much as opposed to a fully open table of slightly protruding garnets. Thats my thinking anyways. I thought at the start my coti was super slow on water, now its alot faster, sometimes 50 laps after slurry after refreshing it, I recently got a la verte mini coti and it has less tendancy to swarf up on the surface. its a bit easier to get a HHT.
I'm just a coti newbie, but is it the case that the only difference between coticules is how you get to a good HHT, some being easier than others to get an edge?
regards Alex
2011-11-15 22:23
justalex:
some being easier than others to get an edge?
regards Alex
Yes One of easier layers is the La veinette. The Les pettites blanches are for the advanced honers
Alex.
Best regards
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Giannoulakis
from Athens Greece
from Athens Greece
2011-11-15 22:33
Emmanuel:
justalex:
some being easier than others to get an edge?
regards Alex
Yes One of easier layers is the La veinette. The Les pettites blanches are for the advanced honers
Alex.
Best regards
Emmanuel
I am not so sure that some layers are for advanced honers only, I think the layer one spends most time with, becomes easiest for you, and that's far more important than trying to select an "easy" layer
And I think the whole mellow edge thing, has been quite rightly put down to getting the most out of the Coticule, regardless of layer.
Regards
Ralfson (Dr)
We Are All Pioneers In Our Own Right.
The Infamous Coticule Crew
Pip Pip Old Bean
The Infamous Coticule Crew
Pip Pip Old Bean
2011-11-16 01:07
I agree. My first was an LPB, and it remains the easiest strata for me. 
Paul
"Focus on the journey, not the destination. Joy is found not in finishing an activity but in doing it" - Greg Anderson
my blog- and it works again :p
"Focus on the journey, not the destination. Joy is found not in finishing an activity but in doing it" - Greg Anderson
my blog- and it works again :p
2011-11-16 14:52
Ralf ,Paul. I consider that i have to clarify saying < for the advanced honers >
No doubt that everything coticule is suitable to generate a perfect smooth edge.
My LPB is a kind of fast on slurry and fast on water as well. Additionally is a producer of autoslarry ,that means needs a last finishing under the faucet rinsing continuously.
If i don't rinse continuously i reach an HHT 2-3. By rinsing i get an HHT 4.
So ,i don't thing so that my hone is the best idea for a beginner because will be disappointed.
Saying my hone ,i mean the specific hone. Maybe other LPBs are easiers and not produsers of autoslurry.
We must therefore conclude that is not a question of Stratas but is an issue of specific stone.
Looking forward to your opinion.
Best regards
Emmanuel
No doubt that everything coticule is suitable to generate a perfect smooth edge.
My LPB is a kind of fast on slurry and fast on water as well. Additionally is a producer of autoslarry ,that means needs a last finishing under the faucet rinsing continuously.
If i don't rinse continuously i reach an HHT 2-3. By rinsing i get an HHT 4.
So ,i don't thing so that my hone is the best idea for a beginner because will be disappointed.
Saying my hone ,i mean the specific hone. Maybe other LPBs are easiers and not produsers of autoslurry.
We must therefore conclude that is not a question of Stratas but is an issue of specific stone.
Looking forward to your opinion.
Best regards
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Giannoulakis
from Athens Greece
from Athens Greece
2011-11-16 16:35